Deprecated: Assigning the return value of new by reference is deprecated in /export/nfs-mounts/nas2.cws.dpdcn.unt.edu/virtual/www_mcdu_unt_edu/wp-settings.php on line 512 Deprecated: Assigning the return value of new by reference is deprecated in /export/nfs-mounts/nas2.cws.dpdcn.unt.edu/virtual/www_mcdu_unt_edu/wp-settings.php on line 527 Deprecated: Assigning the return value of new by reference is deprecated in /export/nfs-mounts/nas2.cws.dpdcn.unt.edu/virtual/www_mcdu_unt_edu/wp-settings.php on line 534 Deprecated: Assigning the return value of new by reference is deprecated in /export/nfs-mounts/nas2.cws.dpdcn.unt.edu/virtual/www_mcdu_unt_edu/wp-settings.php on line 570 Deprecated: Assigning the return value of new by reference is deprecated in /export/nfs-mounts/nas2.cws.dpdcn.unt.edu/virtual/www_mcdu_unt_edu/wp-includes/cache.php on line 103 Deprecated: Assigning the return value of new by reference is deprecated in /export/nfs-mounts/nas2.cws.dpdcn.unt.edu/virtual/www_mcdu_unt_edu/wp-includes/query.php on line 61 Deprecated: Assigning the return value of new by reference is deprecated in /export/nfs-mounts/nas2.cws.dpdcn.unt.edu/virtual/www_mcdu_unt_edu/wp-includes/theme.php on line 1109 January « 2008 « MARC Content Designation Utilization

Archive for January, 2008

Identifying and Understanding Factors Affecting Catalogers’ Utilization of MARC

Tuesday, January 1st, 2008

The MCDU Project investigated catalogers’ use of MARC fields, subfields, and other content designation structures (CDS) in over 56 million MARC bibliographic records from OCLC’s WorldCat database. As we confirmed through our analysis that a relatively small percentage of available CDS are typically used, the recurring question was: Why do catalogers do what they do? The MCDU Project did not study this question but the Project provide a wealth of empirical data about the records created in the cataloging enterprise. The results and findings about catalogers’ use of MARC CDS can be further informed by studying the factors that affect catalogers’ utilization of MARC.

In our original proposal to the Institute of Museum and Library Services for the MCDU Project, we included as one of the project goals: Investigate a methodological approach to understand the factors contributing to current levels of MARC content designation use and relationships with the cataloging enterprise. A specific objective of the MCDU Project was: Develop a methodological approach to identify and understand factors contributing to catalogers’ use of MARC content designation. We have addressed this objective by producing the following document:

MARC Content Designation Use over Time

Tuesday, January 1st, 2008

The MCDU Project focused on analyzing cataloger’s use of MARC fields, subfields, and other content designation structures (CDS). The first phase of that analysis examined the use of MARC CDS based on format of material and source of cataloging. We know, however, that over time the CDS available to catalogers changed as MARC evolved. New CDS were added, some were deleted, and format integration brought together similar CDS from various formats.

The MCDU Project Team carried out a second phase of analysis that attempted to take into account the dynamic and evolving nature of MARC and the CDS available to catalogers over time. A document listed below describes the methodology for this analysis. In addition, the frequency counts and tabulation upon which this summary is based are available in a set of data reports listed below.

Before this analysis could be carried out, it was first necessary to document when new fields, subfields, and other CDS were added, deleted, and/or changed. No existing database or resource existed that documented the evolution of MARC CDS. The MCDU Project created HistoriMARC, a database that stores in structured form all available information about MARC bibliographic CDS from 1972 through 2004. HistoriMARC was the enabling tool for carrying out the analysis of MARC use over time since it allowed us to manipulate and reuse data about CDS additions, deletions, and other changes in our analysis. A summary of the results and findings is provided in the document, Catalogers’ Use of MARC Content Designation over Time: An Analysis of MARC Records from 1972 to 2004.

Catalogers’ Use of MARC Content Designation over Time: An Analysis of MARC Records from 1972 to 2004.